OMO boar

Message

TRASH · #1 Post by **TRASH** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 1:08 pm

Yes the wife uses omo for that brilliant whiteness only omo can give wash after wash

TRASH · #2 Post by **TRASH** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 1:10 pm

EH !!!!!
IT BLIMEN WORKED HA

HERES ANOTHERY THEN

TRASH · #3 Post by **TRASH** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 1:14 pm

hOW COME THEY ARE KINDA HAZY AND LARGE HOW DO I MAKE EM SMALLER AND NEATER

TRASH · #4 Post by **TRASH** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 1:16 pm

What the heck

OMO was here !!!
this is fun eh !!!

MICC · #5 Post by **MICC** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 5:07 pm

Hey Mick, cut down on the caffeine abit, your starting to talk to yourself again.

erron · #6 Post by **erron** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:06 pm

That's sometimes the only way to have a sensible conversation!

hOW COME THEY ARE KINDA HAZY AND LARGE HOW DO I MAKE EM SMALLER AND NEATER

You have to make them smaller and muck about with the settings in some program like photoshop.

I'll see what I can do with this lot, though...

Nice set of ivories in that second shot, I must say! First time I've seen those 'downunder' tusks!

Erron

erron · #7 Post by **erron** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:19 pm

Okay, I did a quick muck around in Photoshop, and came up with these:

erron · #8 Post by **erron** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:21 pm

Hmmm, could have gone a little darker, but you get the idea, I hope.

Erron

adam · #9 Post by **adam** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:06 pm

The dentis recomends colgate. Good piggy.

this is about as big as my traditional pigs have gotten so far but I hope to change all that soon. Top boar Trash hope I can take something like that one day with trad gear. Photo by Dave Whiting. 1 arrow 130w ribtek location Byrock. Badland recurve.

TRASH · #10 Post by **TRASH** » Tue Oct 07, 2003 3:04 pm

Yes
I agree with ya Erron i could do with a bit more of a tan Oh !!! by the way i'm the porker in the back ground HA !!!!
enough out of you MICC if all three of us were in the photo you would definately need a wide angle lens.

Erron took a bit to get these on had to reduce pixels ect to get it to accept it but we got there,do you know if when scanning them you can set them to scan at the same size you require???? just happened to have the work digital with us when we rolled this fella ,.

erron · #11 Post by **erron** » Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:22 pm

If you scan at around 75 dots per inch (DPI) you'll most closely match the standard DPI of a computer, which is a maximum of 72 DPI. Anything more than that is wasted, most of the time,and blows the dimensions of the piccy out.

I think you can scale the pic down in Photoshop to a size, as well as make other adjustments. I haven't used it too much.

BTW, I thought OMO meant On My Own when I read the thread title, then I opened it up and saw ya had company!

Erron

MICC · #12 Post by **MICC** » Wed Oct 08, 2003 10:53 pm

Oh thanks Mick, very hurtful mate.........bloody true though.
Back to the mung beans and chuck'en the leg over Shania every night.
How about a little walk and scare a few scrub bulls.
Micc

TRASH · #13 Post by **TRASH** » Mon Oct 13, 2003 2:17 pm

Bettys as ready as ever mate just name the weekend man .....
SHOULD I BRING A LADDER.!!!! or A quick dig shovel .
WHERE the hell am i gonna hide .

#14 Post by **Stickbow Hunter** » Mon Oct 13, 2003 5:18 pm

Just make sure you leave the poodle at home though Strowie.

Don't forget to leave one of those Ol' boys for me. Also you can scout around let me know the location of the biggest and easiest tree to climb - on second thoughts, maybe not as I wouldn't have time to check for the chainsaw cut.

Jeff