To cant, or not to cant

Questions and answers. How to tune your bow, match those arrows and how to shoot your bow or hit the target. Its all here!

Moderator: Moderators

Message
Author
Brumbies Country
Posts: 981
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 9:18 pm
Location: Yass NSW

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#31 Post by Brumbies Country » Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:52 am

Morning Grahame

Yes I figured it came down to distance from the bowhand and while the finer points of physics continue to elude me I can appreciate that the distance of the arrow rest from the bow hand is going to magnify variations from the vertical. In IFAA barebow recurve you are permitted to fit a very small level to your bow. You cannot do that under FITA rules. I was wondering about string alignment which I use to use as a sort of rear side re limiting horizontal spread of arrows, but re keeping the bow vertical I reckon the string alignment is going to uniformly tilt as the bow tilts from vertical.

Simon

User avatar
Stickbow Hunter
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 11637
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 8:33 pm
Location: Maryborough Queensland

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#32 Post by Stickbow Hunter » Fri Jan 13, 2012 10:03 am

Brumbies Country wrote:In IFAA barebow recurve you are permitted to fit a very small level to your bow.
And they call that barebow! :shock: :roll:

Jeff

Brumbies Country
Posts: 981
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 9:18 pm
Location: Yass NSW

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#33 Post by Brumbies Country » Fri Jan 13, 2012 12:28 pm

Fair enough comment Jeff:lol: . Under those IFAA rules you are allowed to have a clicker too, but it must be mounted below the arrow. At the IFAA Bowhunter Chamionships last Easter at Wagga I didn't include either the clicker nor the level. Come to think of it you were allowed a stabiliser too which I also didn't have.

User avatar
Stickbow Hunter
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 11637
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 8:33 pm
Location: Maryborough Queensland

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#34 Post by Stickbow Hunter » Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Brumbies Country wrote:Fair enough comment Jeff:lol: . Under those IFAA rules you are allowed to have a clicker too, but it must be mounted below the arrow. At the IFAA Bowhunter Chamionships last Easter at Wagga I didn't include either the clicker nor the level. Come to think of it you were allowed a stabiliser too which I also didn't have.
They certainly have a strange idea of what a bare bow is mate. :confused: :lol:

Jeff

wishsong
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:47 pm

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#35 Post by wishsong » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:52 pm

I think its a matter of need .
If you want "hunting groupings " at hunting ranges [ 20 and under ] I don't think it matters that much but for more extended accuracy at longer ranges it would seem that the less cant the better .
John Schulz , protege of Howard Hill tells of both he and Hill's bows became more vertical the longer the shot, ditto Byron Ferguson ... IFAA champs' Steve Morely and Larr Yien shoot there bows with little cant [ but they can if the shot calls for it ] and noted coach and IBO champ Rod Jenkins bow is plumb straight up and down . Look at the pics of Saxton Pope ... his bow is pretty straight up , shooting off his hand .
Just as there are many great shots who shoot with there bow well canted , I'd suggest that as a general rule the really top shooters most likley have there bows straighter up and down than the less accomplished shooters ....
Maybe thats why I cant my bow so much ...... :shock:

I have never bought in to the whole target vs hunting arguement . A good shot is a good shot is a good shot ...... and as such will likely be able to make a good shot under many conditions, terrains , time constraints etc

littlejohn59

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#36 Post by littlejohn59 » Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:30 pm

Canting a bow depends on the distance of how far you want to shoot for accuracy. Close up it doesn't really matter(30 m). If you want accuracy 40 metres onwards, i find holding the bow perpindicular to the ground results in better accuracy. ian

Brumbies Country
Posts: 981
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 9:18 pm
Location: Yass NSW

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#37 Post by Brumbies Country » Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:34 pm

I reckon that's a pretty good summary wishsong. Interesting your mention of Steve Morely. He doesan't get a lot of mention in Oz but is a darned good shot. US born but living in Estonia if memory serves me correctly.

wishsong
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:47 pm

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#38 Post by wishsong » Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:20 pm

Brumbies ...
Steve M is one heck of an archer eh ! He seems to do well regardlss of where what and how . But more than anything he is always more than willing to help out another archer , share his ideas and even ask questions .....

alaninoz
Posts: 218
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 6:22 am
Location: Canberra, Australia

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#39 Post by alaninoz » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:58 am

Stickbow Hunter wrote:
Brumbies Country wrote:In IFAA barebow recurve you are permitted to fit a very small level to your bow.
And they call that barebow! :shock: :roll:

Jeff
Terminological problem. What is termed generally thought of as barebow, and is termed barebow in ABA, is termed Bowhunter Recurve or Bowhunter Compound in IFAA. In IFAA barebow you can also use a long stabiliser.

Don't understand it myself, but they are the terms they use.
Alan

longbowinfected
Posts: 2040
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:42 pm

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#40 Post by longbowinfected » Sun Jan 15, 2012 8:51 am

Simon, Steve Morley is a Brit. Had problems with GNAS not sending modern longbowers to FITA 3D Worlds as GNAS uses ELBs.
Steve had met a lovely Estonian lady, settled down there and set up an archery park there He became their national champion and coach. I spent a fair bit of time talking with Steve and he is a really great guy. He was competing basically with all his fingers totally curled over like a claw. Physios were working on him every moment. He still gets on well with the British archers. We both spent a fair bit of time with the English longbower Burke, who was the captain of my group.

Steve did cant into the hill a wee bit on the horrendous angles when shooting across the slopes. The distances there had a 30 metre maximum but lots of 40 degree slopes.

We talked a lot about canting as a group. Discussion ran pretty much the same as here. Burke shot bolt upright with his ELB. He and I were the only ones who regularly shot longer distances in target. The french. Italians and Spaniards shot with over exaggerated canting. The northernmost Europeans and Russians were more upright. The French, Italians and Spaniards all grunted and yelled louder than the professional ladies tennis players. Two these ladies, one on each side was breathing hard and hot in my earhole and grunting right next to me at the practice range.......takes a bit of getting used to.

Kevin
never complain....you did not have to wake up....every day is an extra bonus and costs nothing.

User avatar
Stickbow Hunter
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 11637
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 8:33 pm
Location: Maryborough Queensland

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#41 Post by Stickbow Hunter » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:17 pm

Thanks for that info Alan. I don't have anything to do with those associations so I had no idea what their rules were.

Jeff

Brumbies Country
Posts: 981
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 9:18 pm
Location: Yass NSW

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#42 Post by Brumbies Country » Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:00 am

wishsong wrote:Brumbies ...
Steve M is one heck of an archer eh ! He seems to do well regardlss of where what and how . But more than anything he is always more than willing to help out another archer , share his ideas and even ask questions .....
I've read some of his replies on Tradgang and they are very well thought out. He also features very well in results.

Brumbies Country
Posts: 981
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 9:18 pm
Location: Yass NSW

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#43 Post by Brumbies Country » Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:03 am

alaninoz wrote:
Stickbow Hunter wrote:
Brumbies Country wrote:In IFAA barebow recurve you are permitted to fit a very small level to your bow.
And they call that barebow! :shock: :roll:

Jeff
Terminological problem. What is termed generally thought of as barebow, and is termed barebow in ABA, is termed Bowhunter Recurve or Bowhunter Compound in IFAA. In IFAA barebow you can also use a long stabiliser.

Don't understand it myself, but they are the terms they use.
Thanks Alan

Much better spelling out of the IFAA situation than mine. I thinlk you are alowed a short stabilizer in the bowhunter recurve too. See you next weekend. Will send a separate email.

Simon

Brumbies Country
Posts: 981
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 9:18 pm
Location: Yass NSW

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#44 Post by Brumbies Country » Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:22 am

longbowinfected wrote:Simon, Steve Morley is a Brit. Had problems with GNAS not sending modern longbowers to FITA 3D Worlds as GNAS uses ELBs.
Steve had met a lovely Estonian lady, settled down there and set up an archery park there He became their national champion and coach. I spent a fair bit of time talking with Steve and he is a really great guy. He was competing basically with all his fingers totally curled over like a claw. Physios were working on him every moment. He still gets on well with the British archers. We both spent a fair bit of time with the English longbower Burke, who was the captain of my group.

Steve did cant into the hill a wee bit on the horrendous angles when shooting across the slopes. The distances there had a 30 metre maximum but lots of 40 degree slopes.

We talked a lot about canting as a group. Discussion ran pretty much the same as here. Burke shot bolt upright with his ELB. He and I were the only ones who regularly shot longer distances in target. The french. Italians and Spaniards shot with over exaggerated canting. The northernmost Europeans and Russians were more upright. The French, Italians and Spaniards all grunted and yelled louder than the professional ladies tennis players. Two these ladies, one on each side was breathing hard and hot in my earhole and grunting right next to me at the practice range.......takes a bit of getting used to.

Kevin
Hi Kevin

That's really interesting feedback from a number of perspectives. Firstly, I didn't know the Brits limited their longbow in FITA 3Di to ELBs. Part of that really strikes a chord with me but it must put them at some disadvantage. Apologies for getting Streve Morley's initial nationality mixed up; I think I knew he was of British ancestry but because he posts on Tradgang somehow got the US association. I didn't know he has that finger problem. Always had it or just recent? Shoots extremely well with that sort of problem.

Back on topic, interesting the international variation in canting. The 30m max may be of significance there but still interesting. That grunting gets me in the tennis. Would have thought it completely unnecessary in archery.

Really appreciate your feedback on the international differences.

Simon

User avatar
Chase N. Nocks
Posts: 1463
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#45 Post by Chase N. Nocks » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:51 pm

G'day all.

Ok this question could have gone in either recent post so I just picked this one as the biggest.

How about canting the bow shooting three fingers under. Yes. No. maybe.

Also I am sure I have seen bows that have a riser built in such a way that the hand is canted but the bow is upright.

Anyone familiar? Why isn't that concept more popular? What is this called and who makes such bows?

OK, more than one question. :roll: :biggrin:

Cheers
Troy
I am an Archer. I am not a traditional archer, bowhunter, compound shooter or target archer.....I am an Archer
"Shooting the Stickbow"

....enforced by the "whistling grey-goose wing."
"The Witchery of Archery"

Eagle
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 11:20 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#46 Post by Eagle » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:46 pm

I shoot 3 under and I find the bow cants ever so slightly. It's a natural position for the bow as I reach anchor with the 1st finger touching the corner of my mouth. I don't purposely can't it I just let the bow "do the work". When I try to keep the bow perfectly upright I tend to lose focus on other stuff so I just do what works for me. After all I found that's with everything in archery, "each to their own"
To fail is to never have tried...

User avatar
Kendaric
Posts: 247
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:01 pm

Re: To cant, or not to cant

#47 Post by Kendaric » Wed Oct 02, 2013 8:31 pm

Canting the bow is more so for longbows were the arrow sits 1/8" outside centre shot and instinctive shooters. Another reason for canting the bow for some is to get there eye directly over the arrow. Recurve and modern longbows shooters with large cut out windows and centreshot risers dont have so much of this issue, so holding the bow vertical is preferable for string/arrow/sights/gap/point of aim alignment shooting.

Post Reply