Interesting artical!!!

General Hunting News & Alerts. The place for posting and reading about what's happening in the world of hunting, for finding out what our Friends & Foes are up to, and how we are responding.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Stickbow Hunter
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 11637
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 8:33 pm
Location: Maryborough Queensland

Interesting artical!!!

#1 Post by Stickbow Hunter » Sun Dec 11, 2005 3:32 pm

I saw this on the Leather Wall and thought I'd share it here. The author, Nicholas Kristof raises some very valed reasons for hunting. I think this kind of article is far to rare now days and I think their would have been quite a lot of letters to the editor about it.

What do you think?

Jeff



For Environmental Balance, Pick Up a Rifle By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF Here's a quick quiz: Which large American mammal kills the most humans each year?

It's not the bear, which kills about two people a year in North America. Nor is it the wolf, which in modern times hasn't killed anyone in this country. It's not the cougar, which kills one person every year or two.
Rather, it's the deer. Unchecked by predators, deer populations are exploding in a way that is profoundly unnatural and that is destroying the ecosystem in many parts of the country. In a wilderness, there might be 10 deer per square mile; in parts of New Jersey, there are up to 200 per square mile.

One result is ticks and Lyme disease, but deer also kill people more directly. A study for the insurance industry estimated that deer kill about 150 people a year in car crashes nationwide and cause $1 billion in damage. Granted, deer aren't stalking us, and they come out worse in these collisions - but it's still true that in a typical year, an American is less likely to be killed by Osama bin Laden than by Bambi.
If the symbol of the environment's being out of whack in the 1960's was the Cuyahoga River in Cleveland catching fire, one such symbol today is deer congregating around what they think of as salad bars and what we think of as suburbs.

So what do we do? Let's bring back hunting.

Now, you've probably just spilled your coffee. These days, among the university-educated crowd in the cities, hunting is viewed as barbaric.
The upshot is that towns in New York and New Jersey are talking about using birth control to keep deer populations down. (Liberals presumably support free condoms, while conservatives back abstinence education.) Deer contraception hasn't been very successful, though.

Meanwhile, the same population bomb has spread to bears. A bear hunt has been scheduled for this week in New Jersey - prompting outrage from some animal rights groups (there's also talk of bear contraception: make love, not cubs).

As for deer, partly because hunting is perceived as brutal and vaguely psychopathic, towns are taking out contracts on deer through discreet private companies. Greenwich, Conn., budgeted $47,000 this year to pay a company to shoot 80 deer from raised platforms over four nights - as well as $8,000 for deer birth control.
Look, this is ridiculous.

We have an environmental imbalance caused in part by the decline of hunting. Humans first wiped out certain predators - like wolves and cougars - but then expanded their own role as predators to sustain a rough ecological balance. These days, though, hunters are on the decline.
According to "Families Afield: An Initiative for the Future of Hunting," a report by an alliance of shooting organizations, for every 100 hunters who die or stop hunting, only 69 hunters take their place.

I was raised on "Bambi" - but also, as an Oregon farm boy, on venison and elk meat. But deer are not pets, and dead deer are as natural as live deer. To wring one's hands over them, perhaps after polishing off a hamburger, is soggy sentimentality.

What's the alternative to hunting? Is it preferable that deer die of disease and hunger? Or, as the editor of Adirondack Explorer magazine suggested, do we introduce wolves into the burbs?
To their credit, many environmentalists agree that hunting can be green. The New Jersey Audubon Society this year advocated deer hunting as an ecological necessity.

There's another reason to encourage hunting: it connects people with the outdoors and creates a broader constituency for wilderness preservation. At a time when America's wilderness is being gobbled away for logging, mining or oil drilling, that's a huge boon.

Granted, hunting isn't advisable in suburban backyards, and I don't expect many soccer moms to install gun racks in their minivans. But it's an abdication of environmental responsibility to eliminate other predators and then refuse to assume the job ourselves. In that case, the collisions with humans will simply get worse.

In October, for example, Wayne Goldsberry was sitting in a home in northwestern Arkansas when he heard glass breaking in the next room. It was a home invasion - by a buck.

Mr. Goldsberry, who is six feet one inch and weighs 200 pounds, wrestled with the intruder for 40 minutes. Blood spattered the walls before he managed to break the buck's neck.

So it's time to reestablish a balance in the natural world - by accepting the idea that hunting is as natural as bird-watching.

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company

piggy
Posts: 1167
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Melbourne

#2 Post by piggy » Sun Dec 11, 2005 5:28 pm

Great article there mate

User avatar
Rue
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:16 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

#3 Post by Rue » Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:24 pm

Jeff,
I was almost taken one year by a whitetail deer coming down out of my tree stand back in 1994 rut. I was hunting the woods in front of house at the time and had taken a shot at a large bodied 6 point buck. I shot over top his back at about 5pm. in the evening with my arrow. He ran out of bow range but the buck stayed in the area. I was using the horns to rattle and grunt call and also had doe scent placed in dummy scrapes. he was pretty worked up, but did not come close enough for a shot.

It became to dark to see and I started climbing down the tree and all of the sudden three or four steps from the bottom I heard a sound coming towards me. It was that same buck charging at me coming down out of the tree. He only missed taking me out by a few feet at the least and I don't mind tell you I was scared to death walking out of the woods that night. They are for certain a bit on the aggressive side.
Rick

User avatar
Stickbow Hunter
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 11637
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 8:33 pm
Location: Maryborough Queensland

#4 Post by Stickbow Hunter » Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:31 pm

Rue,

That must have been scary alright. I'm sure those sharp antlers could cause some serious injury.

Jeff

User avatar
Rue
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:16 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

#5 Post by Rue » Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:36 pm

Yes sir I know a few people who have been hurt pretty badly. My great grandfather was one he had almost all his ribs broken by a buck.
Rick

Richard
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:26 pm
Location: Bloody hot Brisbane

#6 Post by Richard » Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:44 am

There was a report in one of the papers over here of a guy from near my home town who farmed red deer, been gored and killed by one when it was in rut. There were also comments from other deer farmers in the area of similar near misses. Looking at the at the antlers on the bucks and stags I would imagine that they could do a lot of damage.

User avatar
danceswithdingoes
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 5:48 pm
Location: Kyogle NSW

#7 Post by danceswithdingoes » Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:17 pm

Whilst in Kansas in 94 I had a whitetail buck broadside my car, as I reversed back to check on him, he got up shook himself off and disappeared into the woods in a single bound, tough critters :shock:
ImageImage

User avatar
ishootstuff
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Perth

#8 Post by ishootstuff » Wed Jan 03, 2007 5:37 pm

That doesn't surprise me, due to humans changing environments and introducing new species and diseases to araes, there are lots of animals that should be culled in australia alone there are, cane toad, bush pig, camel, rabbit, and the list goes on.
It is just a matter of finding out these numbers, i don't understand how some of the animal rights activist cannot admit that sometimes animals need killing.
Hunting is a cheap, enjoyable and safe way to control populations as there is no risk of introducing animals (the cane toad was introduced to control cane beatle) or chemicals (like DDT).
:D smile cos its fun :D

Post Reply